Thursday, March 29, 2012

I'm a Finalist

I finalled in the RITA for 2011.  This is a great honor and just so generally cool I am rendered pretty much speechless.

Black Hawk is one of eight in the Historical Romance category.

To wit:


Always a Temptress by Eileen Dreyer (Grand Central Publishing Forever; Amy Pierpont, editor)

The Black Hawk by Joanna Bourne (Berkley Publishing Group; Wendy McCurdy, editor)

(That's me.  Look.  There I am.  Me.)

The Danger of Desire by Elizabeth Essex (Kensington Brava; Megan Records, editor)

Heartbreak Creek by Kaki Warner (Berkley Publishing Group Sensation; Wendy McCurdy, editor)

The Many Sins of Lord Cameron by Jennifer Ashley (Berkley Publishing Group Sensation; Kate Seaver, editor)


Scandalous Desires by Elizabeth Hoyt (Grand Central Publishing; Amy Pierpont, editor)

Silk Is for Seduction by Loretta Chase (Avon Books; May Chen, editor)

Unveiled by Courtney Milan (HQN Books; Margo Lipschultz, editor)


As you can see -- these are major players here.  I am taking my joy from the Finalist position in the gather-ye-rosebuds-while-ye-may school of reality.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

What I'm doing ...

Picking up a meme here . . .  In this draft of the WIP of the Pax story, on page 77, going to line 7, the next 7 lines are:


Some man had a sweet lover waiting for him.  He wondered if she'd be sharing a bed tonight with somebody on Meeks Street.     

Let's get this over with.  The mug of ale was still full when he slid it onto the nearest table.  He set a coin beside it and picked his bag up, taking it left-handed so he'd have his knife hand free. 

Nobody looked up to see him leave.  It was a point of pride to him that nobody noticed.

He checked to make sure nobody followed him out of the Dog.  It was habit.  Just habit.  He had all the habits of a spy.







This is not a world-shakingly exciting passage, really.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Regency Pyrotechnica

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Friday, March 16, 2012

Striking out at DABWAHA

Edited to Bring everything up to date --

I didn't make it through the second round of DABWAHA, which was kind of a disappointment. 

But I enjoyed playing.
 I continue to think of this as a kind of insidious video game.

There are still prizes for those who follow the contest and guess the next round of winners.

Go  here.

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

DABWAHA rides again

Like, wow
I was idly dropping by to see who would be in DABWAHA this year.  And, oh wow, Black Hawk is in there.

Let me repeat that.  Black Hawk is in DABWAHA.

Wow.



Now, you are probably muttering, "DABWHAT?"

Let me tell you about it. 


DABWAHA is a yearly contest put on by Dear Author and Smart Bitches where Romance and quasi-Romance books slug it out for world domination.
For information on the contest and how to play (vote) see here

Lookit   here   for the DABWAHA books. 
DABWAHA always has great books and if you haven't read all seven of the Historical Romances in contention, I am led to a 'Why Not?'

Anyhow, here's the list.
(Click on the author to go to author website.)

I'm going to add some others that are not Historical Romances, but they are particularly cool.



Now.  Here's a suggestion of how you can help promote works you admire.

In DABWAHA, you not only get to vote and participate and cheer your favorites on.   YOU  -- yes, you. (don't go looking over your shoulder) -- YOU get to nominate your favorites for the contest, one in each category.  Go  here   to add your favorite book that somehow got overlooked in the mad scramble.

I nominated:

Mercedes Lackey's Beauty and the Werewolf in SciFi  ISBN 0373803281
Grace Burrowes' The Virtuoso in Historical Romance  ISBN 1402245701
C.S. Harris' Where Shadows Dance in Crossover  ISBN 0451233956

because those are all three just excellent.

    Sunday, March 04, 2012

    The AAR recognition and . . . rejoicing in Fictionville

    Most excellent reader Valerie G writes to tell me she sees the celebration this way:

    Congratulations on the AAR reader's poll recognition of The Black Hawk, Adrian and Justine!  Richly deserved!

    In their universe, I imagine there's rejoicing all round.

    There will be a celebration to honor Justine and Adrian at Doyle's place in the country, with presents for the happy couple.  Doyle, Grey, Sebastian and Pax chip in on a pair of matched knives, perfectly balanced for throwing, of course. (Later in the evening, Adrian tests them against the mantelpiece.). Ladislaus gives them a set of fake identity papers, because - well, you can never have too many sets of fake identity papers.

    Annique, Jess, and Camille present a silver tea service that Maggie picked out. Severine thinks about baking something, but Maggie talks her out of it.  Carruthers sends a cactus.  Felicity scowls, so they know she's genuinely pleased.



    The party goes on late into the night (or early into the morning, depending on how you look at it) with equal parts champagne and shared stories of the Game...

    Sunday, February 26, 2012

    Giving a Workshop

    I'll be giving a workshop on Point of View at a library near Richmond Virginia.

    Here's the general information, at the library website.

    And, more specifically, what's on offer --

    Chesterfield County Public Library Writers' Workshop
    Saturday, March 10, 9:30 a.m. - 4 p.m.
    Meadowdale Branch Library
    4301 Meadowdale Blvd., Richmond 23234

    Registration $25.00 per person.
    Registration Deadline Friday, March 2

    The presenters:
    Mollie Bryan:  The Mystery Writer’s Toolbox
    Valley Haggard:  The Art of Creative Nonfiction
    Valley Haggard:  Blasting through Writer’s Block
    Joanna Bourne:  Point of View:  Dive into Your Character’s Head

    Registration Includes a box lunch by Positive Vibe Café  
    Please call Blanche DePonte at 804-717-6381 for more information. Registration forms will be available at all Chesterfield Public Libraries or can be downloaded and printed from their website library.chesterfield.gov

    Tuesday, February 14, 2012

    Technical Topics -- Character Description

    Someone was asking whether they should pour out the whole description of a a character all at once -- which might be dull -- or chop it up some and spread it out over a chapter or two.

    It occurred to me that this was missing the point somewhat.

    So I thought a few scattered thoughts on describing characters.
     
    When you describe a character, you can give a mere list of the obvious. Hair color, eye color, what he's wearing, height, skin tone. But description is more interesting and useful when it serves a secondary purpose. That's thrifty writing.

    So we describe our characters and do something else as well.  Here's three or four of the several ways to add value to character description:
    (ETA, I made that five ways.)

    1) You can tell story with description. Make the appearance part of the ongoing action. The description shows result of what has been and intention for what is coming. You could think of it as description propelled by the action.

    Not -- 'he had blue eyes'.
    So much as -- 'he opened blue eyes, bloodshot from last night's bender'.

    Not -- 'she had brown hair, worn long'.
    But -- 'She wrestled with wind-tangled brown hair, taming it before she walked into the meeting.'

    Not -- He was a huge, rough-looking man with a scar on his face and gray streaks in his hair. He dressed in the respectable, worn clothing a laborer might wear.

    But -- He was dressed like a laborer today . . . a big, ugly, thuggish, barely respectable giant in sturdy clothes. His hair was wet and the gray streaks didn’t show. The scar that ran down his cheek was fake. The imperturbable strength wasn’t.

    See how the first set of these is a static description. The second is a description that could only be right in that exact moment.
    We don't just say, 'this is how Doyle looks', we imply he has looked different in the past.  It's not how he happens to look; his appearance is related to the rain outside.

    2) We do not just see our fellow; we see him through one specific set of eyes. The POV character adds value, insight and weight to the description. The description turns around and reveals that POV character.

    She watched him work for a moment, disquieted by the edged beauty of his face. Lines of his hair fell in thin slashes of black. His lips were strongly marked.


    She was totally feminine in every movement, indefinably French. With her coloring—black hair, pale skin, eyes of that dark indigo blue—she had to be pure Celt. She’d be from the west of France. Brittany, maybe. Annique was a Breton name. She carried the magic of the Celt in her, used it to weave that fascination the great courtesans created. Even as he watched, she licked her lips again and wriggled deliberately, sensually. A man couldn’t look away.


    Could that description of Hawker come from anyone but Justine?  Could Annique be seen that way by anyone but Grey, right then, right there, in their prison?

    3) Description is not a 'fill in the blanks' list of things we need to convey. It's part of an overall impression. We do not need to be only literal. For the larger portrait, we mix physical details with metaphor and symbol, story history, archetype. Give the hair color, shape of nose, texture of skin.  Sure. But also enmesh them in meaning when you do it.  Imbed them in the intangibles of the character you are creating.

    She had the face of an ardent Viking. Strands of wet hair lay along the spare curve of her cheek, outlining the bones. Her eyes were the color of Baltic amber.

    He was young to be captain. Thirty, maybe. He had black hair and a big beak of a nose, and sailor skin, dark and rough, burned by suns that weren't polite and English. Colorful splotches of blood were drying on his shirt. That would be her blood, probably.


    4) We use the small details and all the senses.

    He couldn't remember the last time he'd wanted a street whore. This one was fresh as a daisy, clean and sweet. She smelled of soap and flowers and spices. Even her fingernails were clean.


    ETA:  The comment trail, and a comment elsewhere, brought to mind another common use of character description.  This uses description for a structural purpose. 

    5)  Let's say you're going to step outside the on-going action, bring the narrative drive to a screeching halt, slow the pacing to molasses, and do some backstorying or philosophizing.  Character Description is a great way to segue into the internals you're laying down.  Backstory, for instance.  

    Lookit here.  We're fairly early into Black Hawk and I'm filling in the What Has Gone Before column. 

    “She’ll make it. She’s hard to kill.”

    “Many have tried.”

    Her hair spread everywhere on the pillow. Light-brown hair, honey hair, so soft and smooth it looked edible. He knew how it felt, wrapped around his fingers. Knew how her breasts fitted into his hands. He knew the weight and shape and strength of her legs when they drew him into her.

    A long time ago, she’d shot him. They’d been friends, and then lovers, and then enemies. Spies, serving different sides of the war.

    The war was over, this last year or two. Sometimes, he walked outside the shop she kept and looked in. Sometimes, he found a spot outside and watched for a while, just to see what she looked like these days.


    The last time they'd exchanged words, she'd promised to kill him.  He hadn't expected her on his doorstep, half-dead, running from an enemy of her own.
     

    I have the most dangerous woman in London in my bed.  


    That's description opening the door to backstory.  We go in the order:
    a) See her now. 
    b) Think about her then.
    c) Talk about the past.
    d) Bring it back to the present. In this case I do that with a line of Internal Monolog.





    ETA2: It occurs to me that I didn't really answer the question at the top.  
    How long can a piece of Character Description be?  

    Keep it short.  

    Do not indulge in the flowery crap that readers skip anyhow.  
    Doesn't matter how beautiful the words are, they have to earned a place in the story with something more than pretty.
    This here is a famous example of what readers skip. 

    I don't say you can't describe at length.  But if you've written more than half a page of Character Description, you should probably go back and reconsider.

    Monday, February 13, 2012

    Hoo Boy, Black Hawk is Best Romance at All About Romance

    Oh wow.

    Black Hawk has made an incredible showing in the All About Romance Reader's Poll.
    Here.




    (People liked it!!  They really liked it!  Lookit!  Lookit!)
    (hyperventilates and uses up most of her exclamation points for 2012.)



    Go here to see the covers of the other wonderful books readers chose.  You can click right through and have a close look and buy.  It's a wonderful list because these are fellow readers talking to you. 

    This is the great stuff that came out in 2011.  Something for everybody.


    Magic Slays by Ilona Andrews
    Seduction of a Highland Lass, Maya Banks
    The Black Hawk, Joanna Bourne
    The Perfect Play, Jaci Burton
    Silk is for Seduction by Loretta Chase
    The Other Guy's Bride, Connie Brockway
    Breaking Point, Pamela Clare
    Dragon Bound, Thea Harrison
    My One and Only, Kristan Higgins

    Notorious Pleasures, Elizabeth Hoyt
    Fifty Shades of Grey, E.L. James
    When Beauty Tamed the Beast, Eloisa James
    A Lot Like Love, Julie James
    The Admiral's Penniless Bride, Carla Kelly 
    What I Did for a Duke, Julie Anne Long
    To The Moon and Back, Jill Mansell 
    All They Need, Sarah Mayberry
    Curio, Cara McKenna
    Unraveled, by Courtney Milan 
    Unlocked, Courtney Milan 
    Call Me Irresistible, Susan Elizabeth Phillips 
    Just Like Heaven, Julia Quinn 
    Treachery In Death by J.D. Robb 
    New York to Dallas by J.D. Robb 
    Archangel's Blade, by Nalini Singh
    Stranded With Her Ex, Jill Sorenson 
    Yours To Keep, Shannon Stacey


    This is what I said at the AAR site:

    I don't know what to say. I am touched beyond measure and utterly flabbergasted. Thank you. 

    Black Hawk was a hard book to write. Five years ago, when I was putting the finishing touches on Spymaster's Lady, I firmly relegated Adrian to supporting-character status. He wasn't sequel bait, I thought. He was too hard, too cynical, and too wounded to ever make hero material.

    "But I found myself fascinated by him. He kept trying to take over other people's books. After a bit, it became apparent the only way I could get Adrian to stop upstaging the current hero was to give him a book of his own.


    "I am so happy to think of my Justine and my Adrian coming alive in peoples' minds. If I was writing of the long journey these two had to take to earn their happy ending, I'm overjoyed to know readers liked traveling with them.

    "I am so proud that Black Hawk holds these honors for 2011. Thank you, everyone who voted. And thank you, AAR, for supporting the Romance genre for all these years.

    image Hawk attrib phae

    Saturday, February 11, 2012

    Doing the Writerly Thing

    Nothing too exciting to write about, but the mood struck me anyhow. 

    Worked a little in the morning at the cafe.

    Creative barista is creative

    Yeah! Booksigning!!


    The posters for the March booksigning have been handed over to the out-of-town folks by my most excellent friend Mary Ann.




    I sorted the animals. 
    What, doesn't everyone have huge pet beds in the living room?
    Sorted animals










    They promised us snow, but it never materialized.  We do however have ferocious winds and cold.  22 degrees (minus 5 for you folks who think in Celsius.)  I have stacked up the firewood for a long evening.


    I am not writing on the Pax manuscript just at the moment.  I'm trying to understand the next contract.  Eventually I will give up and just sign the thing.

    I'm going to go back and move the first Pax/Camille dialog into her viewpoint and out of Pax's.  This is not just a 'When all else fails, try changing the viewpoint' kinda thing.  There's probably some reasoning behind it. 

    This whole first third of the manuscript is just a plotting mess.  

    Wednesday, February 08, 2012

    Jo Beverley Interview and A Scandalous Countess

    Jo Beverley
    Joanna here, and an interview with the illustrious Jo Beverley, bestselling author of over 30 Historical Romances, one of 12 members of the RWA Hall of fame, and just a really cool writer.

    Her latest book,  A Scandalous Countess, came out yesterday and she's agreed to talk about it a little, down there at the bottom.



    Me:  A Historical Romance novelist needs to be a historian, a storyteller, and a technically skilled writer. Tell us a little about how you balance these three parts of your writing.

    Jo Beverley:  What an interesting question! The historian side can be the most  dangerous. It can suck me into research for the sake of research (and what's wrong with that? it protests) and used to tempt me to structure a book around some neat knowledge instead of the characters and the love story. I think I've won that battle, at least. I don't see a distinction between technical skill and storytelling, because I believe that anything that enhances the story, even incomplete sentences, dangling participles et al, is excellent technique for storytelling.


    Me:  Did you come across any new and exciting historical tidbits while you were researching *A Scandalous Countess*?

    Jo Beverley:  That fish could block London's water system!

    I simply wanted to show Georgia being practical in her position as a patroness of a charitable home, but doing what? The water supply seemed a nicely down-to-earth one, but I had to research it. (And wasn't that fun, whispers the research demon.) Most prosperous homes had water supplied a few times a week, but it came from the minor rivers, so sometimes a fish or eel blocked the pipe. Of course people didn't drink water unless they could afford to have it come by barrel from a pure source, like the chalk Downs.

    In the 18th century they drank small beer and later they drank tea. The secret? Both involved boiling the water. I remember my grandmother insisting that the steam must come out of all the vents on the kettle for at least a minute before pouring the water into the pot. I just put it down to an obsession with the water being hot enough, but now I think perhaps it was old wisdom of how to be sure the water was safe.

    Me:  Your next book, A Scandalous Countess, is set in 1765.  Why do you choose to write in the Georgian period?

    I fell in love with the Georgian period through Heyer's Georgians. Above all, it's the Georgian men I love. Strong men in plain dark clothing make me yawn, and I wrinkle my nose at stubble, but put them, well polished, in silken finery and I melt. Put them in high heels and they're even yummier, especially when they're carrying a sword and will kill with it if they have to.

    It's also an exciting period all around. It's the period of the Enlightenment, when any idea was to be analyzed, questioned, and if necessary discarded for a better way, and I'm talking about the upper classes here, who led the explorations. The Georgian aristocracy could be wild, greedy and corrupt, but in general they weren't lazy. Intellectual curiosity was fertile ground for the age of revolutions -- the agricultural and industrial as well as the political.

    Me:
    What do you like least about this era?  What are the hardest realities you find yourself 'writing around'?


    You ask devilish questions! It was harsh for the weak and vulnerable, though to be fair many of the wealthier people worked hard to help. Politics was dirty and at times chaotic, which can be great for plots, and in fact, though the surface is smoother now, has much changed? Women lacked many rights and were vulnerable to abuse.

    The area I write around is medical. That's not the fault of the Georgian age and things don't improve much for the next century or so, but my characters in all periods have good teeth and good health. If they get wounded I try to make it plausible that they can recover without lingering effect.


    The greatest danger from lesser wounds was infection and sewing a wound would have horrified a doctor of the time as it hid any infection. The wound was, if necessary, held open until safe. That's from the first edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, 1768, which is available as a replica. I keep promising myself I'll read it cover to cover. It's fascinating.

    Me:  In A Scandalous Countess, your heroine has unfairly lost her reputation in 'Society'.  Why does this matter?  How important was this reputation thing, really?

    In my opinion many historical romances overplay the lost reputation card by using it to force marriages over a kiss, for example, but a real scandal definitely left a stain, on men as well as women. There would be places where they weren't welcome and many people who would avoid them. George III was quite sticky about who was welcome at court, and access to court was seen as crucial in the beau monde. Some people wouldn't care about that, but others would be devastated, which is true today. Some in that situation chose exile.

    Georgia has been accustomed to a very high and very comfortable position. She's not willing to contemplate exile and is focused on proving her innocence and getting her life back.

    Me:
     If you were to join your fictive world; if you could become one of your characters -- even a minor character -- who would you be?

    Temporarily or permanently? I think I'd be Elf Malloren for a while -- Lady Elfled Malloren as was, now Lady Walgrave, heroine of Something Wicked. She's fun, active, and would take me into the heart of the Malloren family as well as all over fashionable society.

    Me: Tell us about your latest novel, A Scandalous Countess, that hit the stands yesterday.

    As I indicated above, it's about a young, beautiful countess who wakes up to find her delightful life in ruins. Her husband has been killed in a duel and rumor whispers that it was fought over her. In addition to the scandal, because she hasn't borne an heir, she's lost her homes and her husband's wealth.

    Her powerful family whisk her back to the family home for a year of demure mourning, but the scandal won't die, so in due course she determines to return to London, establish her innocence and get her life back -- ie find another rich, highly titled man to marry.

    But then there's Lord Dracy, a scarred ex-naval officer. Georgia's father has asked her to help Dracy adjust to society, and she agrees out of kindness, but he's not the "beached tar" she expects. Instantly she likes him and soon she's attracted to him. There's no future in that, however, because he lacks a high title, money, and perhaps worse actually enjoys living in the country!

    When it becomes clear that someone won't let the scandal die Dracy is her strongest ally. But how can they have a truly happy ending?


    Thanks for much for dropping by the blog, Jo.  A Scandalous Countess, takes place in the Malloren Fictive World.  I'm looking forward to reading it.
    Buy A Scandalous Countess at Amazon, B&N, kindle, nook, or Powells, and wherever fine books are sold.

    Jo Beverley is GIVING AWAY a hot-off-the-presses copy of A Scandalous Countess to one lucky reader in the comments field.  Come tell us what you think of Scandal in the world of Georgian England.

    Friday, February 03, 2012

    2011 AAR Reviewers Choice: Black Hawk

    I am so happy
    I am deeply honored to get the nod at All About Romance
    for Reviewers Choice for 2011,
    for The Black Hawk.

    The AAR announcement is Here.

    They say such nice things about the book.  I'm blushing. 

    Now, being perfectly honest here, I nipped in to top place, but just barely.  It was very close.  I just squeaked by these two great books:

    Silk is for Seduction, Loretta Chase
    The Rose Garden, Susanna Kearsley


    These are the other Historical Romances the AAR reviewers loved:

    A Night to Surrender, Tessa Dare
    The Orchid Affair, Lauren Willig
    What I did for a Duke, Julie Ann Long
    Heartbreak Creek, Kaki Warner
    A Lady's Lessons in Scandal, Meredith Duran 
    When Beauty Tamed the Beast, Eloisa James
    Follow My Lead, Kate Noble

    If you are kind enough to like my books -- and I can't imagine why you would be reading the blog if you didn't -- you should go buy these.  Wonderful books.

    Wednesday, February 01, 2012

    Walking Through Regency London

    I've been tryAgasse, Jacques-Laurent flowerseller 1822ing to imagine what the streets of Paris and London looked like and felt like underfoot in the Georgian and Regency eras.

    The fashionable streets of Mayfair are fairly easy to picture.  We have lovely paintings of these, for one thing.
    The wide, clean, quiet streets with expensive houses. The squares, with maybe a garden in the middle.  Yes.  I can see these.

    I have some feeling of what the rookeries might have loGustave-dore-orange court drury lane 1870oked like too.  The grainy, mid-Victorian photos of the London slums give us an idea.  Hogarth illustrates the underbelly of London on one side of the era. Gustaf Dore on the other.

    There be those who say that things and places have souls, and there be those who say they have not; I dare not say, myself.  H.P Lovecraft
    But, what about the middling streets?  Not the privileged haunts of the nobility.  Not the stews.  The everyday streets and passageways of London and Paris.  My characters spend most of their time in this ordinary sort of place.  What did it look like?

    We have pictures. 
    St-martins-church-george-scharf 1828

    Burras_Thomas_The_Skipton_Fair_Of_1830 cropped










    Raymer the cross chester















    And we can guess a lot about what the city looked and felt like from elements common to cities now.

    For more, travel to Word Wenches here.