I was thinking about the first page.
The first page is a semaphore where the author sends the reader messages. It's a place of signals, flags run up the mast, secret handshakes.
What are we saying, as writers, on page one?
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Friday, November 27, 2009
Ah .... the holidays
turkey
gravy
mashed potatoes
summer squash and wild mushrooms
cauliflower and cheese sauce
yeast rolls with walnuts
fresh spinach salad
pumpkin pie
apple pie
No dressing.
The refrigerator decided to freeze my vegetables.
Celery does not like to be frozen
gravy
mashed potatoes
summer squash and wild mushrooms
cauliflower and cheese sauce
yeast rolls with walnuts
fresh spinach salad
pumpkin pie
apple pie
No dressing.
The refrigerator decided to freeze my vegetables.
Celery does not like to be frozen
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Technical Topics -- Beginnings and Tipping Points
I was thinking about story openings, since I will have to do one soon. I was trying to decide what makes a good opening, and how I start my own stories. These two are not necessarily linked by bands of steel.
Thinking about process ...
The story opening is determined by the big crisis that lies at the heart of the story. The Climax. The Big Kahuna.
Now, of course, there's lotsa stuff that leads up to that Crisis. Various characters did this and that and weather happened and a declaration of war and Susie came down with the pox.
But when I go seeking for a good opening, I'm looking at what the female protagonist does -- Her thoughts, actions and decisions. Because, for me, the book is about the female protagonist. She's going to determine where the story begins.
So ... I look at the protagonist's actions as far as I have them figured out.
Of course, I don't look at every bloody thing she does.
There are those actions that are absolutely necessary for The Crisis to occur and the story to take the path it does. This is 'story action'.
Then there's a whole bunch of to-ing and fro-ing that could be changed without affecting the story much. That is not 'story action' and I can kind of ignore it.
Entering the vampire cave is necessary. It is 'story action'.
Buying eggs at the market -- not so much.
It's like that.
When I wander through the protagonist's story action, what I'm looking for is 'tipping points'.
One of these tipping points is going to be the first scene in the story. I just have to find the right one.
"'Tipping points'?" you say.
And "?"
Yeah. Ok.
Every story has many places where a different decision would lead to a different Crisis and a different story. These are 'tipping points'. These are moments where the protagonist has an opportunity to change everything. Her decision could go either way. What she decides matters.
Going aside here to natter about generalities ...
Tipping points make the protagonist strong and interesting. Story is not about what happens to the protagonist. Story is what the protagonist decides to do with what happens to her.
And the tipping points are her decisions.
This is where she grabs hold of the story by the throat and wrestles it down and makes it do what she wants.
Writers -- giving my opinion here and knowing it is not necessarily true -- want to show these tipping points, because they are so important and so revealing and just so generally cool. Even if everybody who's slogged their way to page 134 knows the protagonist will not run from the upcoming battle, the reader still wants to see that decision to stay and be brave. She wants to see the 'tipping point' where the protagonist has a choice and makes it.
All of which is just generally to speak in praise of tipping points.
Anyway. Getting back to where the beginning of the story is going to be.
I look at my protagonist's actions. I look at her decisions.
I want to start the story with a tipping point.
Why do I pick one tipping point and not another?
What is characteristic of the scene and the tipping point that starts the story?
*-- The tipping-point decision in the scene that starts the story is necessary for the action of the story. It directly leads to the Crisis at the end.
*-- The start scene is early in the long sequence of protagonist actions related to the Crisis.
(Right. The beginning scene is early. yeah. duh ...)
But not too early.
What it is ...
There's a long line of protagonist actions, stretching way into the past and extending far into the future. Maybe like, y'know, beads.
Only a little section of this action can happen 'on stage' in the book.
We know the last on-stage actions are going to be when The Crisis is resolved.
The first on-stage actions ...
Well, we're working on the beginning right now.
We want to scoop as much important story action into the book as we can. We want all the good stuff to happen 'on stage'. Essential story action that happens before the beginning of the book has to be shoved into some flashback or backstory or some kind or prologue. This is a weakness in the story structure.
Note how I'm talking only about 'story action'. We want to scoop in story action. The important stuff. We want to write it out as scenes and put it on stage.
We don't want to write scenes that have no story action and only convey information. We especially do not want to start with a scene like that.
*-- Ideally, we want to start with a scene that is chronologically tight with the rest of the story. That is, we do not want an outlier in time. This avoids a hiatus in the action.
If we can manage it, we don't go all prologue-y with a, 'Two years before' . . .
Prologues are necessary in some stories, but I feel it may not be the tightest of all structures. There are folks who disagree with me.
Full disclosure time here -- I have to keep knocking my hand off the keyboard to keep myself from writing prologues.
*-- A tipping point means the protagonist makes an active choice. She has the capacity for some sort of action.
Sometimes there doesn't seem to be much the character can do. The protag is a victim trapped in the dungeon. A Cinderella bound to her stepmother's will.
What the writer does is shake the story around to give the protagonist choice. Even a limited choice can be the tipping point.
In the dungeon, the protagonist makes a decision not to reveal her secrets whatever happens. Her silence keeps her alive long enough for the partisans to rescue her. She gives half her bread to the other inmate -- the man who will later be the key to getting her out of the fortress. She palms a spoon to scrape through the rocks and thus has a weapon the next time the cell door is opened.
Cinderella decides to approach each daily, demeaning, unfair household task with a stalwart heart and a generous spirit. It is her light-hearted singing --rather than sullen acceptance -- that leads the Prince to her.
The tipping point is a decision that changes the story.
It can be made even when the character is under fierce constraints.
And if the protagonist's actions and decisions keep not affecting the outcome of events . . . why not?
*-- It is especially exciting if the tipping point is a decision that rests on a knife edge. Where it could go either way.
*-- All else being equal, I like a tipping point that involves 'big screen action'. That is -- the protagonist makes a decision that results in big bodily motion. Getting-into-a-car-and-racing-down-the-mountain decisions, rather than stern conversation or hiding the jewels in the sofa cushions.
This is just me. Personal preference. Ignore it.
*-- For the first scene, you want a tipping point that reveals one of the most basic aspects of your protagonist. It's not just an important decision. It's the decision this character, idiosyncratically, would make.
*-- A tipping point is always encased within 'story action'. Every scene is built around 'story action, of course, (did you notice I don't use initials for tipping point?) but the first scene is especially built around story action. And the tipping point is embedded in this action. It is not just wandering off in the mist somewhere admiring the action over its shoulder.
The tipping point can never be description of an average morning or talking heads informing us about the lost gold mine.
*-- While the tipping point has to occur somewhere in the first scene, it need not be laid out right in the opening lines. It doesn't have to be the major action shaping the scene.
It can be quite a small thing. Not obvious.
*-- In genre Romance, one or more tipping points are likely to arise in the hero/heroine meeting.
These are neat tipping point to start the story with because the H&H meeting all by itself ties up a bunch of plotting thingums the writer has to get out of the way in the first couple chapters.
So, in genre Romance, a good beginning might be the tipping point where the female protagonist decides how to deal with the hero . . .
'Will she rescue the hero or leave him in prison?'
'Will she approach this dangerous man on the street, or back off and find some more cautious way to accomplish her ends?'
'Will she stay to spy on the approaching stranger on the chance he is the messenger she's waiting for, or will she run to safety?'
Three small decisions. (Three books.) The decisions pass almost unnoticed in the scene. But these tipping points define the protagonist. If she had acted differently -- no story.
Thinking about process ...
The story opening is determined by the big crisis that lies at the heart of the story. The Climax. The Big Kahuna.
Now, of course, there's lotsa stuff that leads up to that Crisis. Various characters did this and that and weather happened and a declaration of war and Susie came down with the pox.
But when I go seeking for a good opening, I'm looking at what the female protagonist does -- Her thoughts, actions and decisions. Because, for me, the book is about the female protagonist. She's going to determine where the story begins.
So ... I look at the protagonist's actions as far as I have them figured out.
Of course, I don't look at every bloody thing she does.
There are those actions that are absolutely necessary for The Crisis to occur and the story to take the path it does. This is 'story action'.
Then there's a whole bunch of to-ing and fro-ing that could be changed without affecting the story much. That is not 'story action' and I can kind of ignore it.
Entering the vampire cave is necessary. It is 'story action'.
Buying eggs at the market -- not so much.
It's like that.
When I wander through the protagonist's story action, what I'm looking for is 'tipping points'.
One of these tipping points is going to be the first scene in the story. I just have to find the right one.
"'Tipping points'?" you say.
And "?"
Yeah. Ok.
Every story has many places where a different decision would lead to a different Crisis and a different story. These are 'tipping points'. These are moments where the protagonist has an opportunity to change everything. Her decision could go either way. What she decides matters.
Going aside here to natter about generalities ...
Tipping points make the protagonist strong and interesting. Story is not about what happens to the protagonist. Story is what the protagonist decides to do with what happens to her.
And the tipping points are her decisions.
This is where she grabs hold of the story by the throat and wrestles it down and makes it do what she wants.
Writers -- giving my opinion here and knowing it is not necessarily true -- want to show these tipping points, because they are so important and so revealing and just so generally cool. Even if everybody who's slogged their way to page 134 knows the protagonist will not run from the upcoming battle, the reader still wants to see that decision to stay and be brave. She wants to see the 'tipping point' where the protagonist has a choice and makes it.
All of which is just generally to speak in praise of tipping points.
Anyway. Getting back to where the beginning of the story is going to be.
I look at my protagonist's actions. I look at her decisions.
I want to start the story with a tipping point.
Why do I pick one tipping point and not another?
What is characteristic of the scene and the tipping point that starts the story?
*-- The tipping-point decision in the scene that starts the story is necessary for the action of the story. It directly leads to the Crisis at the end.
*-- The start scene is early in the long sequence of protagonist actions related to the Crisis.
(Right. The beginning scene is early. yeah. duh ...)
But not too early.
What it is ...
There's a long line of protagonist actions, stretching way into the past and extending far into the future. Maybe like, y'know, beads.
Only a little section of this action can happen 'on stage' in the book.
We know the last on-stage actions are going to be when The Crisis is resolved.
The first on-stage actions ...
Well, we're working on the beginning right now.
We want to scoop as much important story action into the book as we can. We want all the good stuff to happen 'on stage'. Essential story action that happens before the beginning of the book has to be shoved into some flashback or backstory or some kind or prologue. This is a weakness in the story structure.
Note how I'm talking only about 'story action'. We want to scoop in story action. The important stuff. We want to write it out as scenes and put it on stage.
We don't want to write scenes that have no story action and only convey information. We especially do not want to start with a scene like that.
*-- Ideally, we want to start with a scene that is chronologically tight with the rest of the story. That is, we do not want an outlier in time. This avoids a hiatus in the action.
If we can manage it, we don't go all prologue-y with a, 'Two years before' . . .
Prologues are necessary in some stories, but I feel it may not be the tightest of all structures. There are folks who disagree with me.
Full disclosure time here -- I have to keep knocking my hand off the keyboard to keep myself from writing prologues.
*-- A tipping point means the protagonist makes an active choice. She has the capacity for some sort of action.
Sometimes there doesn't seem to be much the character can do. The protag is a victim trapped in the dungeon. A Cinderella bound to her stepmother's will.
What the writer does is shake the story around to give the protagonist choice. Even a limited choice can be the tipping point.
In the dungeon, the protagonist makes a decision not to reveal her secrets whatever happens. Her silence keeps her alive long enough for the partisans to rescue her. She gives half her bread to the other inmate -- the man who will later be the key to getting her out of the fortress. She palms a spoon to scrape through the rocks and thus has a weapon the next time the cell door is opened.
Cinderella decides to approach each daily, demeaning, unfair household task with a stalwart heart and a generous spirit. It is her light-hearted singing --rather than sullen acceptance -- that leads the Prince to her.
The tipping point is a decision that changes the story.
It can be made even when the character is under fierce constraints.
And if the protagonist's actions and decisions keep not affecting the outcome of events . . . why not?
*-- It is especially exciting if the tipping point is a decision that rests on a knife edge. Where it could go either way.
*-- All else being equal, I like a tipping point that involves 'big screen action'. That is -- the protagonist makes a decision that results in big bodily motion. Getting-into-a-car-and-racing-down-the-mountain decisions, rather than stern conversation or hiding the jewels in the sofa cushions.
This is just me. Personal preference. Ignore it.
*-- For the first scene, you want a tipping point that reveals one of the most basic aspects of your protagonist. It's not just an important decision. It's the decision this character, idiosyncratically, would make.
*-- A tipping point is always encased within 'story action'. Every scene is built around 'story action, of course, (did you notice I don't use initials for tipping point?) but the first scene is especially built around story action. And the tipping point is embedded in this action. It is not just wandering off in the mist somewhere admiring the action over its shoulder.
The tipping point can never be description of an average morning or talking heads informing us about the lost gold mine.
*-- While the tipping point has to occur somewhere in the first scene, it need not be laid out right in the opening lines. It doesn't have to be the major action shaping the scene.
It can be quite a small thing. Not obvious.
*-- In genre Romance, one or more tipping points are likely to arise in the hero/heroine meeting.
These are neat tipping point to start the story with because the H&H meeting all by itself ties up a bunch of plotting thingums the writer has to get out of the way in the first couple chapters.
So, in genre Romance, a good beginning might be the tipping point where the female protagonist decides how to deal with the hero . . .
'Will she rescue the hero or leave him in prison?'
'Will she approach this dangerous man on the street, or back off and find some more cautious way to accomplish her ends?'
'Will she stay to spy on the approaching stranger on the chance he is the messenger she's waiting for, or will she run to safety?'
Three small decisions. (Three books.) The decisions pass almost unnoticed in the scene. But these tipping points define the protagonist. If she had acted differently -- no story.
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Technical Topics -- Organizing the Manuscript
I cannot imagine a more boring topic.
How do I handle the sheer overwhelming mass of research, multiple drafts, out-takes, backups and so on
that constitute a novel?
ETA: This is SO boring I put it all below the fold.
How do I handle the sheer overwhelming mass of research, multiple drafts, out-takes, backups and so on
that constitute a novel?
ETA: This is SO boring I put it all below the fold.
Labels:
Technical Topics,
The Process of Writing
Friday, November 20, 2009
Technical Topics -- Bibliographies . . . French Revolution History
I was thinking I'd add a
'Useful Bibliography of the History of France, with particular attention to the period of the French Revolution and the Age of Napoleon'
on the off chance that this would prove interesting to somebody, someday.
So the bibliography is here , at LibraryThing.
A different kinda bibliography exists here.
This latter bibliography is about one third useful resources on France of the period.
And one third Regency England books.
And the last third is many, many refs on slang and dialect of the time.
I am not absolutely sure that just anybody can get into these spots. If you try, and you can't, let me know.
'Useful Bibliography of the History of France, with particular attention to the period of the French Revolution and the Age of Napoleon'
on the off chance that this would prove interesting to somebody, someday.
So the bibliography is here , at LibraryThing.
A different kinda bibliography exists here.
This latter bibliography is about one third useful resources on France of the period.
And one third Regency England books.
And the last third is many, many refs on slang and dialect of the time.
I am not absolutely sure that just anybody can get into these spots. If you try, and you can't, let me know.
Labels:
French History,
Technical Topics
Thursday, November 19, 2009
A week to Thanksgiving
I look up and Boing! it's a week to Thanksgiving.
Tuesday or Wednesday, I'll get the turkey from Whole Foods. They have always had a good, fresh, small turkey at the last minute.
We'll also do sage and onion dressing. Instead of gravy, I generally make cheese sauce. Then there will be sautéed mushrooms, broccoli, and some kind of potatoes. I'd like something else kinda crunchy. Canned corn? Braised carrots?
And I'll make an apple pie and a pumpkin pie.
So, anyhow, I'm pondering crunchiness.
Tuesday or Wednesday, I'll get the turkey from Whole Foods. They have always had a good, fresh, small turkey at the last minute.
We'll also do sage and onion dressing. Instead of gravy, I generally make cheese sauce. Then there will be sautéed mushrooms, broccoli, and some kind of potatoes. I'd like something else kinda crunchy. Canned corn? Braised carrots?
And I'll make an apple pie and a pumpkin pie.
So, anyhow, I'm pondering crunchiness.
Recent Keepers

I'm kicking back and relaxing a bit,
which is another way of saying that today I sat down to work and didn't get anything much done,
though I may have indulged in Deep Thought.
Anyway ...
Recent additions to the Keeper Shelf
Judith Ivory, Angel in a Red Dress
I imagine there might be a Judith Ivory book that doesn't go on the Keeper Shelf. I mean ... I subscribe to this as a theory. Hasn't happened yet, of course.
Pam Rosenthal, The Edge of Impropriety
I've been reading everything of hers I can get my hands on since she beat the pants off poor Spymaster's Lady in the RITA competition.
Just saying.
Just saying.
Jerome K. Jerome, Three Men in a Boat
What kind of parent names their helpless and innocent kid, 'Jerome Jerome'? Is this the emotional trauma that leads one to write comedy?
Eloisa James, A Duke of Her Own
This may be her best. I'm going to come back to it in a few months and see why the plot works.
Loretta Chase, Lord Perfect
I love Loretta Chase. Y'know.
David Garrioch, The Making of Revolutionary Paris
Which has moved onto the Research Keeper Shelf -- a shelf which obeys wholly different rules from the Regular Keeper Shelf.
I'm going to have to do a Revolutionary and Napoleonic France Bibliography one of these days.
Tanith Lee, The Secret Books of Venus
I don't want to write like Tanith Lee. The writing is too complex and too distracting for the sort of story-telling I'm trying to do.
But she sure does write pretty.
But she sure does write pretty.
I didn't read these half dozen books today and yesterday, of course. This is the pile of books ready to be put up on the Keeper Shelf. It's been accumulating a while. Six months or so.
I have great books still on the TBR shelf.
Including one by Mary Jo Putney
which is next on the list.
Including one by Mary Jo Putney
which is next on the list.
.
I finally sat down and opened Maass' Writing the Breakout Novel. I've been taking Maass down from the TBR shelf and putting him back for four or five years. Then, at the July RWA Conference in Washington I got to listen to about the first fifteen of a speech he was giving and it engendered in me a desire to get to the book.
Though I'm only through the Introduction.
Why I'm mentioning this ...
Maass says,
"Complexity will do that to you. [overwhelm you] Do not panic. Trust the structure of your outline; or if you are an organic writer who works in successive drafts, trust your unconscious mind. The story is there inside you in all its complexity."
So now I know that I'm an 'organic writer'.
I didn't have a name for it before, I just did it.
I didn't have a name for it before, I just did it.
.
Whenever I see Maass' name, I think there's something wrong with typewriter keys, somewhere.
.
Oh. And being FTC compliant I just want to say that nobody gave me any of those books for free.
Or anything for free, really.
Though I did pick up the Jerome K. Jerome book at the SPCA Rummage sale so one could argue that the SPCA is paying me off, I suppose.
Or anything for free, really.
Though I did pick up the Jerome K. Jerome book at the SPCA Rummage sale so one could argue that the SPCA is paying me off, I suppose.
Labels:
Book pimping,
The Process of Writing
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Technical Topic -- What an editor does
I was relaxing after the long sprint to the final on the manuscript of MAGGIE. And I knew I had to come back and face my echoing, empty blog. I feel like this teenager sneaking home and tiptoeing up the stairs WAY after curfew.
So this is me pussyfooting back into the blog, all casual like, and whistling a nonchalant little tune.
Anyhow ... I was posting an answer to a message board in response to how manuscripts get bought -- or not bought -- after an editor has shown some interest.
Having thought about this and made some notes about it, I thought I'd put the information I gleaned here in the blog, too.
n.b. I am not talking about things I have direct knowledge of. I'm pointing towards some more knowledgeable folks. This is useful and interesting but no one should mistake it for me actually knowing anything.
So. What happens after an editor says, "Yes. I like this"?
In a big New York print house, the editor takes the manuscript to a regular committtee meeting of the various associate and senior editors and the managing editor and some sales folks. They've mostly read the manuscripts.
The committee chooses among the possibles. They're going to do this based on what's good, but also on what books they've already bought, what other manuscripts are being offered this week, and generally what they think will sell.
The choices is ALSO going to depend on how enthusiastic the editor is about the manuscript. I think this is why we hear about editors turning down a manuscript they 'like but don't love'.
. . . Because the editor has to convince a hard audience to love the manuscript as much as she does.
Some 'day in the life of' blogs about being an editor are
Lori Foster's interview with Monique Patterson, Cindy Hwang and the much-missed Kate Duffy here, and a bit more stuff, here.
Bloomabilities here.
Moonrat, League of Reluctant Adults, here. And since you're nearby, go ahead and read about The Dream Author (from the Editor's point of view,) here.
Lucia at the Avon blog, here and here.
A Witchy Chicks interview with Kate Seaver of Berkley here.
And an interview with Betsy Mitchell of Warner here.
Steve Whacker, (Ok. Maybe it has nothing to do with committees,) here.
So this is me pussyfooting back into the blog, all casual like, and whistling a nonchalant little tune.
Anyhow ... I was posting an answer to a message board in response to how manuscripts get bought -- or not bought -- after an editor has shown some interest.
Having thought about this and made some notes about it, I thought I'd put the information I gleaned here in the blog, too.
n.b. I am not talking about things I have direct knowledge of. I'm pointing towards some more knowledgeable folks. This is useful and interesting but no one should mistake it for me actually knowing anything.
So. What happens after an editor says, "Yes. I like this"?
In a big New York print house, the editor takes the manuscript to a regular committtee meeting of the various associate and senior editors and the managing editor and some sales folks. They've mostly read the manuscripts.
The committee chooses among the possibles. They're going to do this based on what's good, but also on what books they've already bought, what other manuscripts are being offered this week, and generally what they think will sell.
The choices is ALSO going to depend on how enthusiastic the editor is about the manuscript. I think this is why we hear about editors turning down a manuscript they 'like but don't love'.
. . . Because the editor has to convince a hard audience to love the manuscript as much as she does.
Some 'day in the life of' blogs about being an editor are
Lori Foster's interview with Monique Patterson, Cindy Hwang and the much-missed Kate Duffy here, and a bit more stuff, here.
Bloomabilities here.
Moonrat, League of Reluctant Adults, here. And since you're nearby, go ahead and read about The Dream Author (from the Editor's point of view,) here.
Lucia at the Avon blog, here and here.
A Witchy Chicks interview with Kate Seaver of Berkley here.
And an interview with Betsy Mitchell of Warner here.
Steve Whacker, (Ok. Maybe it has nothing to do with committees,) here.
Labels:
Selling and publication,
Technical Topics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

