I’ve been thinking about “The Setting as Protagonist.” That is, when setting acts in the story. When it has its own narrative.
Fr'instance, consider All Clear
by Connie Willis. This is a
Time Travel SF that moves from a small town in the English countryside in WWII,
to the evacuation at Dunkirk, to Bletchly Park, to the coastal defenses, to London during the Blitz. Time travelling protagonists see the era's awfulness and bravery
through modern eyes.
Willis' use of London-as-a-character
is clearest about midway through the book in scenes of the air attack on St.
Paul’s Cathedral.
How does she do this? Well ... Lots
of prior description of St. Paul's physicality. Vignettes of members of the Fire
Guard. She purpose-builds two Cockney moppets for use in the Blitz subplot. The
protagonist argues that destruction of the cathedral would be a final blow for British
morale.
So. Not just extended metaphor. Setting can be a symbolic equivalence. Can clarify and add an emotional gloss. I find myself rooting for St Paul's
as if it were an old friend.
cf Tolkien's the "Cleansing of the Shire." Burnett’s Secret Garden.
Anybody read Zane Grey nowadays? As a kid, I loved his physical descriptions of the West for their own sakes, because I loved Nature and wildness. I later came to see how he used that wild environment as necessary to the development of his characters.
ReplyDeleteI think of Tony Hillerman.
ReplyDelete