Saturday, April 04, 2009

Women's costume France 1795 - caps and hats

Here we are talking about the headwear of middleclass and working class women in 1794. Women's hats and caps.

(With any of these images, click on the images for a closer look, or visit them at the original sites. )

In the C20, adult women started going bareheaded. Before that, in Western Europe, women wore some type of head covering virtually all the time, inside the house and out -- shawls, caps and hats.
In 1794, inside, most grown women would have worn a cap. Outside, they would have worn a hat, a cap, or both. It's hard to add this to a Historical Romance without the reader finding it strange.

Caps

Caps for our middleclass and working class woman could mean either a simple mob cap or a fancier lace cap. Even a relatively poor woman might wear a fancy lacy cap.

A mob-cap was a circle of cotton or linen, gathered up and held on the head with a band or ribbon. A deep ruffle ran around it, framing the face and neck.

Our famous tricoteuses are wearing mobcaps. In the period it was sometimes called the 'Charlotte Corday'.

In 1794, in Paris, a cap like this would have been ornamented with the tricolored cockade or rosette. It wasn't quite a law that women had to wear the cockade. (It was the law for men.) Women just found it a good idea.



Another tricoteuse in a simple linen cap to the left here. See the slightly different pattern to it.















Here, we got a 1790 cap. It's English, but it's a good workingclass cap, and all these designs are very similar.
A mob cap was the simplest of caps. It was essentially unchanged for a century before 1794 and close to a century afterwards.
The mob cap's design would have conformed to Revolutionary ideas of simplicty and modesty. I'd think it would be 'politically correct' in 1794.
Another simple cap -- if you zip down to the next post, the one on aprons, you'll see a Greuze portrait of a little girl asleep, wearing a simple cap of this type.

Where did women wear caps?
Inside and out.
Here's an early C18 example of women inside the house, wearing simple caps. The wealthy women at the card game wear a couple similar caps. The maid who's serving them coffee has the same cap on, basically. Hers may be a little simpler.
Search it up close here


This is, again, an interior with simple mobcaps. This one is very late C18, and further down the social scale than the picture above. See it here, at Costumers.org, (scroll down the page just a tad.)

This painting may well date to exactly 1790-1795 if those circles on the men's hats are Revolutionary cockades.
All the women inside the house are wearing caps in varying patterns.

This Boilly painting is 1803. We got our upscale people in Paris. Mom -- see her there -- is wearing a sort of turban type cap.

Where I'm going with this picture ....

In the English upper middle class and gentry, there seems to have been something of an age distinction in the wearing of caps.
Young ladies might wear their hair uncovered, gathered in a simple fillette or band. Mature women and married women wore caps. One of the Regency Romance staples is a spinster deciding it's time to start wearing 'caps' indoors.

Did this ' young marriagable' versus 'spinster' age distinction hold true in France? The Boilly portrait, (see it here ) would seem to indicate it might.




Women, as I said above, wore caps on the street, or hats. Sometimes wore caps under their hats.
So, how did you wear a cap and a hat all simultaneous?

Madame Seriziat in this David's 1795 portrait is doing it right here.

Her cap is a large, lacy and fancy one, but the priciple's good for our simper women in simpler mobcaps.



Our 1790s newseller in Paris is wearing a bouffant lacy cap on the streets, not unlike the one in the David picture. Her cap is covered by a fichu sorta scarf, drawn up over her head.
So many things to do with that fichu. I'll be doing a post on fichus sometime or other.

You remember where I said the mobcap was sometimes called the Charlotte Corday? Here's the lady herself.

This is 1793. A nice flouncy mobcap, in our period, on a workingclass woman. Visit it at the Art Institute of Chicago, here.









Midway between a hat and a cap are several sorts of 'turbans'. This is one from 1789. See it here.
These seem to have been worn -- shaped a little differently -- by both sexes. They were popular with the 'arty' crowd. Maybe this was influenced by the same love of the exotic Orient that gave us Banyans.
I'm going to assume these turbans were made up carefully and permanently and set on the head, rather than being created de novo each time from a long swath of fabric.

But maybe not.  See the print on the right.


Ok. Having said that women wore caps and hats about all the time, I'm going to backtrack and say . . . 'They didn't always.'

Sometimes grown women ventured out on the streets of Paris with their heads just bare. Look back up to our newspaper seller above. That woman in the background is capless and hatless.
See the women here also, in this example to the left. Find it at home, here, at the New York Public Library Digital Gallery. Lovely place, the NYPL-DG.

This to the left is a roughly 1790 print -- see the tricolour ribbon on one of those fancy, frilly hats -- that's a feature of the period.

Anyhow, we got a half dozen women sitting on the very fashionable Boulevard des Italiens. A couple of them have uncovered hair. Might be a fillet or band.

The child is wearing a simple straw hat, similar to the David above. The other hats are pretty elaborate. Upscale.
My guess is that 'bare-headed' meant fashionable and young,
or not quite respectable.
I think modest working women had a tendancy to cover up.

The next post, the one about aprons, shows us some prostitutes at the Palais Royal in a time close to our target year. You can wander down and have a look at it. Several of our filles de joie have their hair uncovered.

. . . the thin line between fashionable and indecent.
Never thinner than in Paris of the Revolution and the Directory.




Hats


The chip straw hat in the 1795 David portrait of Madame Serizat, above, is typical of the era. Natural color, flat crowned, with a large flat brim, wide ribbon that coordinates with the outfit, tied under the chin.

In this LeBrun self-portrait to the right, we see a variation of the straw hat. It's similar in shape to the David portrait, and of similar shape, but dyed black, with a feather and no ribbon tying it under the chin.



The brim is turned up a bit.









And to the right we got what calls itself a mixed bag of fashional hats from the last decade of the Eighteenth Century. Find it at home here, where you'll have to scroll down a bit.



These are middleclass-and-above hats, not the wear of a working girl. They're a bit out of the direct thrust of the post. but I'm adding this gallery to give a general picture of what the fashionable were wearing.

A few of these are after 1794, I'm pretty sure.

9 comments:

  1. I love hats. I own a ton of them. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Kat --

    I'll nip in a few more caps and hats when I come across them. These clothing posts sloooowly expand as I find new and better examples. Eventually I'll give them their own 'tag', I think.

    I'm missing the frothy coolness of really good fashion when I concentrate on my humdrum middle-class and working-class.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed this post! I also really loved the fashional hats of the last part of the century.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm looking for closeups of hats. Fashion changes so much, so fast.

    I have a few good street scenes, but they don't translate well to the blog. Too small.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:43 AM

    But where are the pictures?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Anon --

    I had my pictures wiped from the archives of my blog a while back. it's a big job to go through and repair all the broken links and restore the pictures.

    I'm doing this bit by bit.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks for your information, it was really very helpfull..
    Hats

    ReplyDelete