Thursday, May 31, 2007

Copyedits reviewed and sent off

I have met pure evil. It is named the Chicago Manual of Style.

Chicago doesn't let me capitalize titles, like
Chief Officer
and Head of Section
and Director for Overseas Operations.
(The chief officer, head of section and director for overseas operations got together and bought a hatchet to chop the Chicago Manual of Style into tiny, writhing bits.)

Chicago doesn't let me put a hyphen in gray-green or blue-black or red-and-white striped.

Chicago puts double quotes around stuff I want to emphasize in a sentence so it looks like "this" instead of 'this'.

Jeesh.


The Chicago Manual of Style is undiluted malice, unmitigated chaos, unrelieved confusion and stupid, stupid, stupid.
Forget global warming. What we need to fight is the Chicago Manual of Style.

In other news, I have completed the check on the copyedits and returned the marked-up manuscript to New York.
My soul is scarred with little, bitty, comma-shaped shrapnel.
But I will recover.
Someday, I will write again.


All that said, I was given wise and lovely copyedits for which I am grovellingly grateful,
(even if they did use the Chicago Manual of Style.)

Turns out I sent Grey to both Harrow and Eton. (Clever boy. Or possibly incorrigible boy.)
I had a dress change magically from green to blue.
I wrecked havoc. (palm forehead. I know better.)
And something struck like lightening.
(My fingers make this mistake. Generally I go back and catch it. Cripes. Make yourself look like a fool, jo. )

Thank you, master copyeditor, wherever you are.

I had to change my transAtlantic mishmash of spelling to straight American spelling, which is understandable, I suppose.
Sometimes I get puzzled. Why would American writers transmute vivid, traditional, instantly-comprehensible 'blood-red', into 'bloodred'?
What an ugly word. It looks like the past tense of 'to blodder'.


Zokutou word meterZokutou word meter
21,000 / 120,000
(17.5%)


Wordwount of Jessamyn


Zokutou word meterZokutou word meter
31 / 123
(25.2%)


Days to deadline

Friday, May 18, 2007

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Copy Edits

I think I just got the copy edits of Spymaster's Lady.

It's a big white overnight package, anyway.

(Jo feels it and shakes it, wondering.)

Friday, May 04, 2007

Technical Topic -- Pacing

When I write
I don't think so much in terms of 'pacing' as of 'forward momentum'.

Yes, you need to vary the pacing.
Some scenes run just dead fast,
some jog along, intense and steady,
some go contemplative and slow.

Some stuff works better when it's done slowly -- complex emotional development.
Some stuff works better when it's done fast -- fight scenes. Conflict of many kinds.

But more important than the scene moving 'fast' or 'slow' is whether the ongoing narrative drags the reader along.

It is when the reader is not entrapped by the narrative that she stops and says ... 'this is too slow'.
and she doesn't generally mean the pacing should be speeded up.
The pacing can be hectic.
She often means her attention is not beeing pulled along fast enough.

And the writer hears the 'this is too slow' and says ... "I have to speed up the pacing,'
and turns the speed up another notch
and makes more stuff happen.

Look at Hitchcock.
He varies fast- and slow-paced scenes to great effect ... uses a gradual increase in pace to build tension.
And yet, his movies are full of slow-paced scenes
you can't look away from.

Technical Topics -- Synopsis

Couple of thoughts on a synopsis.


A synopsis is you sitting down and telling the story to a friend.
That's the kind of organization and straightforwardness you're aiming for.
If you can, sound like yourself, that's a plus.

This belongs in a synopsis --

Who is the story about?
What kind of person is he?
What problem faced him, or what was at stake?
Why was it important?
What did he do about it?



-- Write they synopsis in present tense.
-- Almost always, give the action chronologically.
-- Follow the story of the protagonist or protagonists ...
-- Don't try to tell everything that happened.
-- Ignore the stories of all the other characters insofar as you can.
-- Do not give plot detail. Give plot essence.
-- Do not keep any secrets or raise any questions you do not answer.
-- Describe minor characters as 'Jim's mother' or 'the Evil Overlord', rather than 'Charlene' or 'Mycroft'.
-- Describe motivation and character of your players, not appearance.
-- No backstory.
-- No descriptiion. No worldbuilding. No explaining.
-- If the story and the synopsis still makes sense after you remove a paragraph or a sentence, remove the paragraph or the sentence.



The agent comes to the synopsis wondering whether you are capable of constructing a story with a beginning, development, and resolution ...
and whether you can create a main character with human motivation who makes believable decisions which result in realistic consequences.

So that's what you want to put into the synopsis.
beginning, development, resolution, motivation, decisions, consequences.

Monday, April 30, 2007

Technical Topics -- Openings

ADVICE THE FIRST -- WRITE THE BEGINNING LAST

Or at least, do the agonizing perfect polish of those first three chapters,
last.

I'm paraphrasing somebody else here ...
can't remeber who just at the moment.

One problem with story openings is that they are technically difficult,
and we write them just when we are least prepared to do so.

We write the opening before we know our characters well,
before we have negotiated the conflicts of Chapters 13 and 22,
before all the 'aha moments' Chapter 8 and Chapter 11.

One way to solve the 'opening problem'
is to sketch out the opening,
finish the ms,
and return to lock down those first three chapters,
last.


ADVICE THE SECOND -- DON'T BE AN AMATEUR

There are some openings
that an agent picks it up and just groans.
Because many many amateur mss start this way.

AAAARRRRGGGGH goes the agent.
You do not want to do this to the nice agent, do you?

Do you want to know what amateur openings look like?

Go thou out to the web and find display sites.
Google -- "writers" "post" "your" "manuscript" "showcase"

Read fifty or a hundred of the offerings.
You only have to read to the point where you know this story sucks.
Look at why you know this story sucks
and don't do that


ADVICE THE THIRD -- SOME STUFF TO PUT IN CHAPTER ONE

Your story has a couple Main Characters. (1)

Your story has something that makes life just hell for an MC. Something that wants to let the air out of his tires and steal his underwear and bite his liver out and chew it up into little pieces and spit it out on the pavement. (2)

Your story also has something an MC would give his right arm up to the elbow for. (3)

Chapter One should contain (1) and either (2) or (3) or both.
It should contain those elements right from the start.

Not the beginning of the element or what will become the element. The element itself.


ADVICE THE FOURTH (AND FINAL) -- STRUCTURE

Do not put in a teaser for a few paragraphs
and then nip away somewhere else --
to yesterday or twenty years ago or Nome, Alaska.

Because wherever you nip to,
it is not as exciting as where you have just been
and the reader knows it.

When you start in a place and time,
with your MC and either (2) or (3) or both,
stay there
for the whole opening scene.


NON-ADVICE --
just an observation.

You can do any durned thing you please,
except bore the reader.
If you write well enough you can start Chapter One with the Vladiivostok telephone directory.
.
.

Saturday, April 28, 2007

I may never get out of Chapter Three

I was sitting in Starbucks yesterday, with my eyes closed. I was inside Jess, feeling the blanket she's wearing – she's not wearing anything else; she leads an eventful existence – and every once in a while I'd open my eyes and be back in Starbucks.

When I was Jess, I didn't hear the background music. When I was in Starbucks, I did. A fine jazz sax.

We travel into our story ... not for revision, redrafting, correction or proofing. But the first time, the creating time, we make the journey all the way to our world.



In other news, got the contract for Spymaster's Lady to sign.
Gee.
Thick little thing, isn't it?

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Still in Three

I'm doing about the fifth draft of the last half of Chapter Three of JESS.
This is probably the final draft.
But then, I've thought that a couple of times before.

Why I'm doing this ...

When I shortened Chapter One to about half of its former glory
and chucked the prologue overboard, (Remember splash?)

I tossed out lots of Jess POV. The balance has shiftered too far away from her.
I need more Jess POV.
Which -- since I'm covering the same territory -- means less Sebastian POV.

I have beautiful passages in that Sebastian POV. I have clever, insightful, incisive, funny work in Sebastian POV.
(splash)

I have to go back and write the scene from Jess' POV.

I can do that. Yes.
But it's hard to write when you're pouting about stuff you had to throw out.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

First Three of Jess

Just about through the final draft of the first three chapters of JESS. It is surprisingly difficult to lick the first three chapters into shape when the rest of the ms is still --- how shall I put this? -- somewhat diffuse.

I have more respect for those folks who can finish and polish just Chapters One through Three, standalone, to submit of send off to contests. Freaking hard.

The Prologue is gone. (splash -- prologue overboard.)
Chapter One has been reduced to a mere nubbins of its original long and winding action.
Chapter Three -- where I am right now -- will now contain two POV flips.

I hate POV flips.
It's holding my fingers to the fire, trying to write them, but the heroine has got to show a larger POV presence in these early pages.

Technical Topic -- Buffer Words

There's stuff we don't have to say.

In POV,
what is described in visual terms, the POV character saw.
Every sound mentioned ... the POV character heard.
All thought and opinion happened in the POV character's head.

We can, if we wish, leave out the 'buffer words' like, 'he saw', 'she noticed', 'he felt', 'he came to the conclusion that', 'he remembered', 'he decided', 'it was his opinion that'.

– The crocodile turned lazily in the bathtub.
instead of ,
He saw the crocodile turn lazily in the bathtub.

– Lightning hit the citadel,
instead of
He heard lightning hit the citadel.

– She combed the werewolf's long brown hair,
instead of,
She decided to comb the werewolf's long shaggy hair.

 – This eggplant is a major mistake,
instead of,
He just knew this eggplant was a major mistake.


– Nobody made seaweed biscuits like his mom,
instead of,
He'd always believed nobody made seaweed biscuits like his mom. 

– The alien landing in '87 was just this bad,
instead of,
He remembered the alien landing in '87 was just this bad.

– She opened the knife drawer.  She must carry a knife tonight.  A large sharp one.
instead of
She opened the knife drawer.  She decided she must carry a knife tonight.  A large sharp one.


By leaving out 'buffer words' we streamline the prose. We connect the reader directly to the experience of hearing, seeing, touching, smelling.  We put the reader so deeply in the POV the character that the character becomes, herself, invisible.  We refrain from reminding the reader of the vessel of perception.  The reader becomes that direct vessel, perceiving the fictional world without buffer or intermediary.

If it matters that someone heard or saw or reached out towards ... we can add this. And if we have not been helpfully informing the reader that, 'Hey, look, Inga is seeing this or hearing this'  ... the reader will now perk up and take notice when we say 'Inga heard ...' The act of hearing has just become significant.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Chapter One of Jess, about final

A young friend, 14, said one of those wise things that always surprise me. Don't know why it should surprise me that she's wise at 14, but it does.

I was complaining how hard it was to rewrite these first three chapters so they'd be in final form to submit.
She said, 'They tell us in dance – When it starts being a job ... quit.'

In other words, if it's not fun, don't do it.

I don't know why this helped, but it did.


So ... Today I finished another jiggle-this-and-that-word-around of Chapter One. It feels about done.
IF it is not too dense.
IF it is not overwritten.
IF I have not lost touch with the POV character's emotion.

I'll set it aside for a week. May I can come back and make an assessment. I'm either astronomically way off and should redo the entire first quarter of the story ... or I'm about ok. I will get an expert opinion on which it is when I submit.


And onward to Chapter Two. Once again, my goal is to eschew the glib and dig deep into the character. Free the man up from the matrix.


So weird. I dreamed about the character Sebastian last night. Never done that before.

Monday, April 09, 2007

Blue Bird

There was a bluebird looking in the bluebird box.

(Everybody hold your breath.)

JoB

Saturday, April 07, 2007

Chapter One JESS

You'd think there would be only so many times you could rewrite Chapter One and stare at it and go stomping around the house and come back and save it as a doc and put it away and start all over again.

You'd think.

I've spent a week doing this.
I think I'm getting closer.

It's all a matter of slipping into VERY deep POV.


Here are some opening lines ...

This was England, so it was raining. Not clean, angry rain that might have done some good washing the street. What she had falling on her was a drizzle like a spoiled child, sullen and persistent and whiny.

or ...

It was London, so it was drizzling. Fog crawled up out of the Thames, smelling of ghosts and bad dreams.

or ...

Jess hated the dark. Worse than rats were likely to come for her if she was out after dark.

And the latest --

Once you get a taste for thievery, you never lose it. Papa mentioned that from time to time, with a little clout to the side of her head so she'd know he was referring to her.

Grumble, grumble, grumble ....

In other news, I took the dog out late last night. It was snowing fluffy wet flakes the size of kittens. We sat and looked at them for a while in the light from the front porch.

Mid April. Whole bunch of surprised plants in my front yard.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

ANNEKA line edits done

The line edits were completed last Wednesday and sent to the editor. Nice overnight service from DHL. They've been accepted. Now the ms goes to the copy editor.

So SPYMASTER'S LADY is essentially done.

Publication date has been moved to January 02. I'm really sorry about the date change. I would have liked to have the book on the shelves just before Christmas.

Now I have to rewrite the opening of JESS.

I wonder if I'm going to end up giving Sebastian a new name. I really like Sebastian.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

ANNEKA Line Edit -- Day Fifteen

I've finished the line edits.
Over the weekend, I'll review them.
With luck, I'll send them off to New York on Monday afternoon or Tuesday morning.

Today, I am, (among other things,) doing taxes.

Doing taxes makes my stomach ache.
Worrying about whether the line edits of ANNEKA will solve the Big Plausibility Problem makes my stomach ache.
Worrying about the opening of JESS makes my stomach hurt.
I am one unhappy puppy.

Last night I did a 'compare versions' on ANNEKA.
My, my, what a lot of little red additions I have made.

The big question hangs in the air -- Did I solve my major problem?
Did I make the big transition in the middle of the story?
Did I solve the Big Plausibility Problem?

We will see what the editor says.

In other news ...
I must rework the very beginning of JESSAMYN to make the protagonists more accessible.

I have pulled my Jo Beverley down from the shelf to leaf through the openings. How does she put the reader in touch with the characters? She's very introspective. Very much 'in voice'. This is what I need.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Anneka Line Edits -- Day Six

I should be calling this 'Spymaster's Lady' line edits, since that's the title. I think.

I'm on page 280 of the line edits.
Since this is the easiest part, I save it for when I'm too zonked to do anything else.
I get zonked doing these line edits. It's hard.

I have two major things I gotta do.

One -- I'm trying to plausible the central transitional plot device. I've backtracked and filled in some foreshadowing. Now I'm buckling down to the scene itself.
More work there.

Other -- I need to add backstory for my McGuffin.
I wander through the manuscript crying plaintively 'Where can I put in backstory?'
I can spend three hours fitting in 50 words.


In other news ... the Forum marathon starts tomorrow. I must gird my, like, y'know, loins

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

After the contract ...

After the agent comes back and says --
'They want to buy the manuscript ...'

-- The agent tells you what the publisher wants to pay and what rights are sold and when various stuff must be delivered.

-- You and the agent work out what you can reasonably negotiate

-- The agent goes forth and negotiates and brings you back the contract terms. You agree to them, probably. The contract is now sent niggling its way through the system.
This will take a long time.

-- The editor calls you and you get acquainted. You discuss the story. She says when her line edits will get to you.

-- She sends you line edits. When you need to get these back is probably covered under the contract. You are on the clock.

-- The editorial assistant e-mails you to say 'hello'.
"Hello."
and ask for a digital submission of the manuscript.
When you explain, in the return email, that it has not been line edited, she says they want it anyway.
This electronic form of the ms is for the Managing Editorial people.
Maybe those are the copy editors.
Maybe they are aliens from space.
I do not know.

The editorial assistant, when asked, discovers that the ms should be sent in .doc with the Italics underlined.
OK.

The editorial assistant also asks for
your picture,
a short bio,
a blurb (for what she calls the Title Information Sheet, whatever that might be,) and
information about the characters' appearance which might be useful to the cover people.

She says not to spend a lot of time on the blurb. It will be rewritten by the marketing people anyhow.

And that's as far as we've gotten.

(jo, manically writing a blurb for tomorrow.)

Publicity

Talked to friends about publicity.

One of them, D --, has just e-pubbed with Wild Rose, so we had lots to chat about in re publicity..

I recommended she try Poddymouth and Smart Bitches to see if she can get a review there.
She has a website set up and will soon be posting her cover.
I thought she might slip into MySpace and see if she thought a presence there would be useful. Somebody over on Books and Writers Forum said that was a good place to make connection with readers.

We discussed other options ... local newspaper, request at the library that they buy the book, note to local Writer's Group to put in their newsletter, dropping by local Barnes and Noble to talk it up, put cover up in the published authors page of Virginia Romance Writers,
and maybe do a sale and signing at the next Festival of the Book ...

That was about all we could come up with. She mentioned bookmarks. I dunnoh how well those work ...

Cleaning of the Blog

Went through the blog today and cleared out some old boring posts.

Left most stuff.
Labeled.

Spiffy clean blog now.

Monday, March 05, 2007

Line Edits of Anneka -- Day Two

Worked through the real simple word changes up to page 267.

Solved two or three of the little questions.
Did some work on two of the big clarify-what's-going-on problems.

Progress.

I still don't know what I'm going to call Anneka. It's hard to think of another name.

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Link of the Day -- Storytelling

Ira Glass on Storytelling here.

thanks to Slithytove

'There are two essential storytelling elements: the interesting anecdote, and the 'moment of reflection'. And raise questions as you go along.'*


JoB
*from Slithytove, under Fair Use

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Line Edits on ANNEKA

Line edits are coming.
They should get here tomorrow
or the next day.

(Snoopy Dance)

I have to change the title of the manuscript and the name of the protagonist
but whot the hell archie toujours gai

Publishing date is December 07

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Visualizing Eleven

The JESS 'Synopsis and Three' are polished and done and mailed ... so that's one thing out of the way. One of the great joys of having this under contract is that I don't have to write a query letter. Oh Joy.

The ANNEKA revisions have not yet landed on me.

So it's back to writing JESS.

Chapter Ten ended with Jess and Sebastian facing off in her office, both of them filled with suspicion, each with an agenda.

Chapter Twelve seems to be that scene at the party where Adrian confronts Jess ... and probably a few other things happen.

I need a bridge.

It might be time for Jess to go talk to her father.

If I do this chapter, I need a core action and purpose. Jess' growth? Hmmmm ...

So far, I've just walked in the front door of Meeks Street. Lots of excitment tomorrow when Jess faces her father.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Chapter Nine done

And moving into Ten ... inside her warehouse, in Sebastian's POV.


final working draft of JESS

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Rules for Writing Historical Fiction

The Rules for Writing Historical Fiction

here

" No matter how prevalent the practice at the time or how wealthy or high-born the heroine is, she must be shocked and appalled at the idea of having a marriage arranged for her."

Oh giggle

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Technical Topic -- Prologues

Seems to me there are three ways to feed necessary backstory into the beginning of a ms.

-- You can feed it in, line by tedious line, across the first several chapters. Skilled writers do this without endangering the pacing and focus ... but it's seldom an improvement to said pacing and focus.

-- You can heap your backstory together in a paragraph or two and 'tell' it, assigning it to a character or placing it in narrative. Good writers do this without imperilling the pace and focus, but, as above, it's never a positive poke to prod the story along its way.

-- Or you can write a vignette. You can present the backstory as 'story' -- a miniscene of elsewhere and elsewhen. Good writers slip these backstory vignettes in skillfully, even use them for story purposes. But the miniscene remains inescapably a diversion from the storyline.


A prologue has the advantages of a backstory vignette -- it can be active and engaging 'story'. A prologue has none of the disadvantages of inter-laced backstory. The prologue doesn't distract from focus or impede pace.

Where prologue is intriguing in its own right, where it slingshots the reader into the ongoing action of Chapter One, and where it offers a true sample of the story flavor, I say, 'Go with it.'

Now, why does this scene or vignette become a prologue instead of, say, Chapter One?

Because Chapter One is the start of the story.

Generally -- not always but generally -- Chapter One is the first essential action of the story line. It is the inciting incident. The big change. The pebble that starts the avalanche. The turning point from which there is no retreat or emendation. The first hundred notes of Beethoven's Fifth.

Backstory is a whole 'nother animal. It can be interesting and essential to understanding the story .... but it is not IN the storyline. An inability to distinguish between backstory and the storyline has led to many dull first-three-chapters which were later, mercifully excised.

Prologues are not a replacement for Chapter One because they are not part of the story action.

A prologues is a nugget of backstory so powerful and necessary, so inciting and harmonious to the mood of Chapter One, that its inclusion prepares us for the storyline action.

Prologues are antipasti. One does not serve the antipasto on the same plate as the veal piccata, nor as a side dish. One does not sprinkle it over the pasta. To do so is missing the whole antipasto point.

Friday, February 16, 2007

March of the Librarians

March of the Librarians

here

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

The Machine is Us

The machine is us.

Here.

The medium is the message is the mass age is the web ...

Technical Topic -- The First Big Edit

So, you've finished the manuscript.

You've finished the big, fat first draft
What next?

Next comes editing.

-- Trust yourself.

-- Expect to go through the whole ms many times.

-- Look at the plot and make sure everything makes sense and all the characters are acting logically and you've wrapped up all the loose ends. Try to see the plot as a whole structure ... maybe even visualize it in shapes and lines and boxes and graphs if that's the way your mind works.

-- Pick out the ten most exciting, heated, high-tension moments in the story. Draw a line that represents your total words ... 150,000 words, 90,000 words. Whatever. Write an X where each of these ten high-profile moments occurs with a really big X for the three largest. Do you like the way this looks?

-- Write your synopsis. It'll help you see plot structure and you'll have to do it sometime.

-- Do a readthrough for one character. Follow him. See what he's up to and how he feels in each scene and whether that's the way he should be feeling when he walks on stage. Then go on and do the same for every character.

-- Toy with the idea of eliminating the first three chapters or picking out and removing a subplot. This may be a perfectly horrible and stupid idea ... but let it pass through your mind at least once as a possibility. This is a good way to shorten the manuscript if it needs it. It's a good way to tighten the plot of any manuscript.

-- Read through the ms slowly, tightening language. Strike out every word and phrase you can. Be especially stern with modifiers. It helps to do this in a new font.

-- Print the manuscript out. Edit by hand. Read it aloud as you go.
-- If you can, set the ms aside for six or eight weeks and return to look at it with new eyes.

-- Hand the ms as a whole to a beta reader. Or more than one beta reader if you are very lucky. (You've done all the stuff above before it goes to the beta reader.)

-- Start working on your query letter.



-- Once all this is done, the minor housekeeping remains.... check the historical dates and the name of the thingie that holds the wick in a period lantern and whether chartreuse had been used as a color before it became a liquor.

... Make sure all your ellipses have only three dots instead of four and your periods are one dot, not two. Look for commas after 'and' and before 'and' -- are you using the Oxford comma? Check that your periods are followed consistently by one space or two, whichever you choose.

... Do a search for your favorite weird words -- excruciating, abrogate, inherent, sleeve, muffin -- whatever it is that your subconscious is in love with, and get them under control. Search also for the common flabbies -- very, somewhat, actually, really.*

... 'It', 'there', 'was' and 'that' are not signs of a weak sentence, but they appear in the weakest sentences. A quick runthrough of these four words may signal some sentences that could be recast a bit.

... Do the spell check.

... and bob's yer uncle. Send out those queries.


* For what it's worth, my own list of words to check includes but is not limited to:
and, but, abrupt, actually, almost, annoy, appear, awful, bastard, because, become, began, begin, bit, bleak, breath, business, careful, chuckle, close, confront, course, dance, deuce, devil, drew, drily, exasperate, eye, face, fact, faint, feel, felt, finger, flat , frown, froze, gaze, gentle, glance, glower, good, grimace, grin, grip, hand, heel, hoarse, hold, instant, irritate, just, know, laugh, lean, lips, listen, little, look, loom, matter, minute, moved, murmur, nervous, nice, nodded, no, now, oh, palm, point, pretty, push, quite, rather, reach, really, scowl, seem, shake, shock, shook , shoulder, silence, slow, smile, snap, snort, soft, somewhat, sort of, sound, start, stood, stop, stroke, studied, subtle, sudden, swallowed, that, then, thoughtful, tight, touch, truly, turned, twitch, very, voice, warm, walk, want, wave, well, whispered, yes.


One compiles this list by noticing as one writes what words are overused and adding those to the list.

Hail

Hail this morning.

(No, this is not a greeting to the dawn but a meteorological observation.)
It had barely started when the cat yowled at the window and came racing in.


Cat: What IS this stuff? What are you DOING to me?
Me: Sorry.
Cat: Snow was bad enough. This is just stupid. Stop it.